New Hampshire is the only state in New England where the executive order restricting citizenship to babies born to parents ...

When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against “universal injunctions” last month, President Donald Trump hailed the decision as a “GIANT WIN” for his administration. Trump added that “the Birthright ...

US Supreme Court ruling, immigrant groups converted their lawsuits into class actions representing babies and parents across ...

Constitutional rights have to be enforceable. They can’t rely on the goodwill of the government. This utter lack of ...

Illinois lawmakers have so far achieved mixed results in efforts to regulate the burgeoning technology of artificial intelligence, a task that butts up against moves by the Trump administration to ...

Still, the Supreme Court's expansive view of presidential power is giving Trump significant leeway -- with potentially more ...

War-torn South Sudan is a country the State Department advises against travel to due to “crime, kidnapping, and armed ...

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D- New York, was once an opponent of nationwide injunctions, declaring in April 2024 that right-wing “activists are exploiting the current makeup of the judicial system to ...

What the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on universal injunctions didn’t do was take a position on the constitutionality of ...

The modern problem of stopping Trump’s executive overreach requires 21st-century solutions. Instead, the Supreme Court handcuffed America to its past.

In a term marked by rulings limiting immigrants’ rights, the court sided with several other people harmed by the criminal justice system.

If every district court judge in the United States had the power to halt an action of the elected government for years every ...